Apa Yang Patut dan Apa Yang Tak patut

Seringkali ketika duduk berseorangan, saya sentiasa memikirkan apa yang telah saya dan orang lain lakukan pada hari itu dan hari-hari sebelumnya. Tidak semuanya baik dan tidak semuanya manis.

Saya telah cuba untuk melakukan apa yang patut setiap hari. Saya akui tidak memadai namun saya sentiasa berusaha ke arah itu. Begitu juga orang lain.

Namun lumrah manusia, akan sentiasa membuat keputusan untuk melakukan apa yang tak patut dari apa yang patut walaupun ada yang cuba menegur tidak kira teguran cara baik atau sebaliknya. Saya tidak terlepas membuat perkara yang sama. Begitu juga dengan orang lain.

Kadang-kadang saya sendiri tidak faham mengapa kita selalu melakukan apa yang tidak patut. Adakah kerana kita terlalu dungu untuk memahami konsep apa yang patut dan tidak patut. Adakah disebabkan kita sentiasa berfikir bahawa apa yang kita buat sentiasa betul atau adakah disebabkan oleh ego semata-mata. Ataupun sememangnya kita tidak mempunyai kesedaran mengenainya.

Kesimpulannya, kita sentiasa silap di dalam membuat keputusan berkenaan apa yang patut dan apa yang tak patut.

I wonder how

First, I would like to make it clear that this article is not politically motivated but must be seen from a point of law. What I am going to write has been argued by Prosecution and many Defence counsel in this country and it is still open for a debate.

The issue that i would like to put forward as known to public that Dato' A has been charged for sodomising his former aide under Section 377B of the Penal Code and could be sentenced up to 20 years and whipping upon conviction.

In this offense, what the Prosecution needs to do is to furnish to court corroborative evidence to support the allegation made failing which many believe the charge will collapses.

The prosecution cannot rely on the evidence of the former aide per se.  it must be corroborated by other independent evidence. 

This would not be an easy task for prosecution because it is widely reported that a medical reports  duly certified by doctors shows that there are no visible signs of penetration of  Dato' A's former aide's anus.

This is because in sexual crime, medical report is important to prove the act. It is needed to show a penetration which is one of the element that must be proved.

Rest assured, the Dato' A's Defense Counsels will not close their eyes of this opportunity. Their duty is to cast a doubt on the prosecution's case. It is simple, if there is a doubt, it means the prosecution has fail to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt.

Be as it may, as this case is still ongoing, we have to wait and see what will be the evidence produced before the court by the prosecution in order to prove the charge. Only the prosecution know with what evidence they have. 

 

Apa la ko Pozi

Salam,

Tak ku sangka rupa-rupanya ada member ni dah terkeliru dengan Aku pun boleh Kecik hati tau!Ada ke dia ingat aku tengah cakap pasal pompuan. Apa la ko Pozi. Takkan aku nak commit suicide di siang hari. Kalaulah betul, balik keja mesti dah kena tibai dengan cik MH. Itu pun kalau sempat sampai rumah.Kepada memberku Pozi, aku cakap sekali lagi...apa la ko Pozi! hehehe

Pozi Samad

ramai sangat peminat. itu lah pasal ada kecik hati. kakakaka

Fri at 11:33 ·

Roy Haizam

aku tgh cakap pasal keta tu. asyik tegur camry je Gen 2 aku buat hal.

Fri at 11:42 ·

Pozi Samad

oooo... ingatkan pasal pempuan. kakaka

Aku pun boleh Kecik hati tau!

"Hati-hati bila bercakap, takut dek kerana pulut santan binasa

Cakap siang jeling-jeling, nanti banyak yang naik juling

hati pun jadi kering

cakap biar betul-betul

jangan jap puh kanan jap puh kiri

macam orang tak sedar diri"

"disclaimer"

 -puisi @ sajak @ cerita pendek @ syair di atas ditujukan khas kepada saya sendiri dan tidak ada kena mengena dengan sapa-sapa. Penjelasan yang dibuat ini bagi mengelakkan perasaan kecik hati dengan tidak semena-mena. Namun kepada yang orang-orang yang alim lagi bijaksana, sudah semestinya boleh mengesan muslihatnya yang  beragam macam  omputeh kato "dak anum membunuh dua ekor burung dengan menggunakan seketul batu" atau "cik pot memanggil Cik kettle black". 

Sebenarnya, ianya ditulis sedemikian rupa kerana baru-baru ini saya mengalami satu sindrom. Tak kronik tapi ironinya nampak je "C" tegur. Nampak je "C" puji.  "C" pun macam tau-tau je. Alangkah rahmatnya, kalau jadi dengan "C", boleh kasi gegar keramat tau! Sungguh tak disangka-sangka, "G" telah berkecil hati  hingga sanggup buat hal. Sikit-sikit dia cari pasal sebab nak ingatkan saya dengan kata-kata orang dulu-dulu iaitu "kera dihutan disusui anak sendiri mati kelaparan". Mungkin dia terasa hati sangat kot bila saya asyik nak "mention" tentang "C" je sedangkan dia kakitangan kanan saya.

Jadi, saya telah membuat keputusan untuk "berposa" seketika dari menyentuh tentang "C" bila "G" ada disisi untuk mengelakkan masalah. Biarlah saya menjaga kebajikan "G" dulu.

Buat "C" for the time being we shall"go and fly a kite". Adios.

My Lady got it wrong.

In is it Fair, I was instructed by my Lady to prove my damages or loss  first. She relied heavily on one principle which said there must be proof of actual loss or damage. Dissatisfied with that, I did my research. Not because I cannot accept defeat but simply because I'm not convinced. It is also part and parcel of  my  profession to find  ways to reverse any finding. l  had strong feeling  the principle referred  can be distinguished even if  applicable. At least I can see whether I'm wrong and not wronged.
I found the answer two days ago. true enough, in almost similar problem, it is clearly stated that it does not require proof of actual damage or loss. What My lady should have done is, in the absence of proof of actual loss, to  give reasonable compensation and applying good sense and fair play.
Now, I'm totally convinced that I was wronged.

 

As posted @t mY Fb wall.

"Rb is considering to lodge a police report against those who are extremely rude. Even If you don't like that King for whatever reasons, to call the king a pariah leader openly is totally unacceptable, an insult and very annoying especially on the day he was laid to rest. Use your brain and keep it to yourself."


The above was my reply to a statement posted by one "kurang ajar" at Fb wall as shown below. At first, I didn't wish to give any comment but then I decided that somebody must speak up. For others, it may be nothing, but for me this kind of comment was done deliberately and with bad intention.

 

"that lunatic will never be a loss to malaysians! a pariah leader indeed! he can curn in hell where he deservedly should be!"

"oops ...: "burn" i mean

Gen-2

Pagi tadi jam lebih kurang jam 7-8 pagi, 21 Januari 2010,  maka lahirlah generasi kedua yang dinanti-nantikan kami semua. Wajahnya tenang dan menyegarkan. Sentuhannya menceriakan. Kehadirannya disisi terutamanya bagi abg ngah dan kak ngah sudah semestinya membahagiakan. Selamat datang Ahmad.